Equity in Evaluation Podcast Series

Equitable evaluation is about people, which requires acknowledging the critical role that relationships play.  While traditional evaluation situates the evaluator as the expert with concrete goals or rigid expectations for outcomes, equitable evaluation is about appreciating that there is always something to learn, valuing the dynamic nature of people and data, and honoring the authentic expertise and lived experiences of those most impacted by the evaluation.                                                                                                                                                                                                         

Shifting from traditional evaluation to equitable evaluation practices takes thoughtful consideration. What do you want to evaluate and how is it meaningful to your mission? Who should be involved in the evaluation process and how should they be engaged? What do we count as credible data and evidence? Implementing equitable evaluation practices requires a willingness to adjust mindsets, engage in reflective practice and approach evaluation in new, liberatory, and disruptive ways.

Since 2018, Pew Charitable TrustsImpactEDMcClanahan Associates and Grovider Learning & Evaluation have partnered to run the Pew Fund Evaluation Capacity Building Initiative (ECBI). The ECBI helps Pew grantees explore how to collect more useful data, encourage data-driven organizational cultures, and build stronger programs. These goals are accomplished by providing one-on-one support and learning opportunities through group sessions and individualized coaching. The ECBI curriculum is grounded in the Equitable Evaluation Initiative (EEI) framework. EEI challenges conventional evaluation orthodoxies, including the emphasis on traditional notions of objectivity, rigor, evidence, and calls on evaluation practitioners to adopt a new set of principles rooted in equity.

All organizations start their journey in the ECBI by learning about equitable evaluation. Our Equity in Evaluation podcast explores the history of evaluation, unpacks the equitable evaluation framework, and features real stories and examples that highlight both the challenge and value of engaging in equitable evaluation practices. Hosts Claire Robertson-Kraft of ImpactED, Wendy McClanahan of McClanahan Associates, and Candace Kenyatta of Grovider Learning and Evaluation, share their own experiences and lessons learned through their capacities as trained evaluators, evaluation practitioners, and nonprofit leaders.

  • Episode 1 introduces the concept of equitable evaluation. You’ll hear our hosts and Meridith Polin, Senior Program Officer at the Pew Charitable Trusts, share their backgrounds and tell stories from their experiences in the research and evaluation field. This episode focuses on the impacts of traditional evaluation practices and how moving towards equitable evaluation better supports and engages the community being served.
  • Episode 2 talks about the people and purpose or the who and why of equitable evaluation. With an emphasis on the values underlying equitable evaluation, this episode focuses on how to advance equity in your evaluation efforts while aligning them with your organization’s mission. You’ll hear about what it means to shift away from traditional evaluation orthodoxies and build stronger relationships with the community you serve.
  • Episode 3 welcomes special guests Kate Callahan and Saxon Nelson from Research for Action (RFA), into the conversation. The episode focuses on the process and practice or the what and how of equitable evaluation. The hosts explore the FIRM framework – Feasible, Inclusive, Relevant, Meaningful – as a way to help organizations embed equity in each stage of the evaluation process. You’ll hear concrete examples of what this looks like in practice, including RFA’s organizational work towards becoming a community-engaged research institution.

As you listen to the podcast, below are some resources to learn more about equitable evaluation and how to apply these practices to your work:

Listen to episodes 12 & 3 and consider how you might be able to use these insights for your evaluation work! If you or your organization have any questions or comments to share, please reach out to Sara at sgreenfield@maieval.com

Don Haworth

Administrative Coordinator

Don Haworth is MAI’s Administrative Coordinator, supporting grants management, accounting, and office operations. Prior to joining MAI, Don worked for Prince George’s County, Maryland, for over twenty years as a firefighter/paramedic, and served in the U.S. Air Force. Don has a long history of volunteer community service, including serving as a volunteer with Boy Scouts of America, participating in and leading several community groups, and was a volunteer firefighter. When he is not working at MAI, Don teaches martial arts and skiing/snowboarding.

Sarah Pepper

Statistical Consultant

Sarah Pepper serves as a Statistical Consultant with MAI. Over the past 25 years, she has worked with a wide range of non-profit organizations and foundations to facilitate the design of data collection and analysis approaches and to help organizations strategize around manageable ways to monitor their fidelity to intended implementation efforts and anticipated outcomes.

She enjoys the experience of continually learning from each organization with which she has the pleasure to work. Sarah is grateful for the opportunity to jointly create evaluation tools and processes that are mutually beneficial to participants and practitioners.

Prior to working with MAI, Sarah worked with Public/Private Ventures as a Research Associate. She earned a Ph.D. in Demography and Sociology from the University of Pennsylvania.

Sarah lives outside of Philadelphia where she enjoys officiating track meets, making new vegetarian recipes, and keeping up with the adventures of her adult children.

Sara Greenfield

Research Associate

Sara Greenfield is a Research Associate at MAI. In her capacity as a Project Manager, Sara has led and overseen numerous diverse projects at MAI. Her experience extends across a spectrum of sectors, including social, health, education, and environmental justice. Sara also brings valuable experience in evaluating learning networks and communities of practice.

Sara is a mixed-methods researcher and is committed to applying a racial equity lens and cultural humility to all of her evaluation work. She is dedicated to gathering nuanced, systematic information about program implementation, constituent voices and experiences, programmatic outcomes, and areas of opportunity. Sara’s passion infuses depth and inclusivity into her evaluation work, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of diverse perspectives and advancing equity within her projects.

Sara, a first-generation Latina college graduate, earned her B.A. in Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience from Temple University.

Sara, her husband Cliff, and two kiddos enjoy exploring outside, cooking and baking together, reading, and doing puzzles!

Wendy McClanahan

President/CEO

Wendy McClanahan is McClanahan Associate’s (MAI) President/CEO. Wendy uses her research and evaluation expertise to help programs, initiatives, and organizations maximize their impact, improve their practice, and fuel systemic change. Her approach centers the expertise and assets of the organizations she works with and the people they serve.

Over her career, Wendy has led studies of out-of-school time and mentoring programs, violence and crime reduction programs, health equity initiatives, and employment and training programs. She also works with organizations to help them grow their evaluation and learning capacity.

Prior to forming MAI, Wendy was senior vice president for research and evaluation at Public/Private Ventures. She has a PhD in Criminology from the University of Pennsylvania and a MS in Human Development from Penn State. 

Wendy lives in the Philadelphia area and enjoys hanging out with her family and friends, playing games, and doing things that get her outside, like skiing and (leisurely) swimming (also known as “floating”).

“My approach to equitable research and evaluation is deeply informed by both my professional expertise and my personal experiences.

Growing up in a family with diverse socioeconomic and cultural roots and later raising a multiracial family has cultivated a profound understanding of varied pathways and the systemic forces that shape opportunity.

This lived experience, which includes navigating the collateral impact of the justice system on families, strengthens my commitment to research that not only rigorously analyzes data but also authentically centers lived experiences and drives actionable change for youth and families.” – Wendy McClanahan